Good evening everyone. We've got breaking news from the Supreme Court moments ago, the

high court blocked in full a decision by Texas-based U.S. District Judge Matthew Kedsmark on April

7 that invalidated the Food and Drug Administration's long-time approval of the abortion pill

MIFA Pristone. Conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito publicly dissented

from the decision. This means the Supreme Court has allowed the pill to stay on the market

and remain widely available at least for now. People can still obtain MIFA Pristone

by mail for now and use it at home and use it up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy as litigation

continues into the Supreme Court. The generic version of the drug made by a company called

Gen Bio Pro will also continue to be available. Joining me now are Mini-Temoradju, president

of the Neyrol Pro Choice America and Lisa Rubin, MSNBC Legal Analyst. Lisa, I want you to

go through this decision with me because, and I think Ari talked about it in the previous

hour, but what I read here is something that kind of reads like shade. This decision,

talking about in recent cases the court has been lambasted for staying a district court

order based on the scanty review this court gives matters on its shadow docket. This opening

with lots of criticism of people who've been critical of the court is that normal and

what do you make of it? This is a court that isn't getting along particularly well,

Joyce. So you're asking me, is this normal? It hasn't been normal up through the Trump

presidency and yet we now have nine justices that are largely at each other's throats

and define the collegiality that has traditionally defined the Supreme Court, but you're right

to say Justice Alito is indeed casting shade and criticizing folks like Justice Kagan

who have been critical of the court for mapping on its policy preferences to a number of

different things through decisions that they don't explain by use of what we call the

...