For the New York Times has been on somewhat of a campaign to disqualify Supreme Court Justice

Sam Alito from being able to serve on several cases related to January the 6th.

Firstly, about two weeks ago on May 16th,

the New York Times published this article right here,

titled, at Justice Alito's house,

a stop the steel symbol on display.

Now, of course, calling it a stop the steel symbol is not totally

forthright and accurate on the part of the New York Times to anyone that knows

American history an upside-down flag is not a stop the steel symbol but rather it's a general

distress symbol it just happened to be one of the symbols that was used around the time of

the 2020 election by those who did not believe in the validity of the election

however and here's the the validity of the election.

However, and here is the crux of the issue,

according to the New York Times article itself.

The flag at Justice Sam Alito's home

was not being flown for political reasons.

Instead, it allegedly arose from an argument among neighbors. Here was

Justice Sam Alito being quoted in the actual article. Quote, I had no involvement whatsoever in the

flying of the flag. It was briefly placed by my wife, Mrs. Alito, in response to a neighbor's use of objectionable

and personally insulting language on yard signs. This then was further corroborated by interviews

that the New York Times conducted themselves with the people

living in the area.

...