Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas
Bribe, Swindle or Steal
Alexandra Addison-Wrage of TRACE International
4.9 • 582 Ratings
🗓️ 7 June 2023
⏱️ 28 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Jesse Eisinger of ProPublica joins the podcast to discuss their investigation into the gifts, travel, tuition, rent and other benefits lavished on Justice Thomas directly—or indirectly for the benefit of family members—by right-wing billionaire, Harlan Crow. Jesse discusses the initial article, the tips they received with additional information after publishing it, and the political backlash to their reporting.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Welcome back to the podcast, Bride, Swindle, or Steel. I'm Alexandra Ragi, and today I'm speaking with the editor responsible for shepherding the recent story about the extraordinary gifts and travel accepted by Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, as well as real estate deals that were |
| 0:21.7 | advantageous to family members. Jesse Isinger has been on the podcast before to talk about his |
| 0:26.9 | book, The Chicken Shit Club, Why the Justice Department fails to prosecute executives. He's a Pulitzer |
| 0:32.5 | Prize winning investigative journalist and currently a senior editor and reporter at ProPublica. Thank you for joining me, |
| 0:38.8 | Jesse. Hi, thanks for having me back. Can you talk us through this story and a little bit of detail |
| 0:45.3 | on how ProPublica uncovered it? In the middle of last year, I was asked to do something that I've never |
| 0:51.4 | done before, which is cover politics, edit political coverage. I've been a |
| 0:57.8 | business and financial reporter and editor my whole career going back to before there was an |
| 1:04.0 | internet in the early 1990s. So this was a daunting task. I began assembling a team at ProPublica to look at it. And we pretty clearly, |
| 1:14.2 | by the end of the year, knew that we wanted to spend the year looking at something about the |
| 1:19.8 | judiciary. We have felt now for a number of years that the judiciary was undercovered. |
| 1:26.6 | You refer to my book that I was on the podcast |
| 1:29.4 | last talking about, which was why we don't prosecute white-collar criminals in the appropriate |
| 1:35.4 | way in this country and why we have a problem that I've come to think of as elite impunity. |
| 1:40.8 | And part of the reason I was really struck with is that the appellate courts wield enormous |
| 1:45.9 | amount of influence and power over white-collar criminals. And the realization I had was that they |
| 1:51.8 | get almost no journalistic scrutiny. The workings of the Second Circuit in New York or the D.C. |
| 1:59.4 | Circuit, which are the two most important business courts |
| 2:02.9 | after the Supreme Court. People don't know any of the judge's names. They don't know how they |
| 2:07.5 | come to their conclusions. No, almost nothing about it. We assigned reporters to do this. |
| 2:12.9 | I assigned two reporters, Justin Elliott and Josh Kaplan, And they convinced me that we should look at the |
| 2:19.8 | Supreme Court first. And I was a little reluctant because I thought that the Supreme Court |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Alexandra Addison-Wrage of TRACE International, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Alexandra Addison-Wrage of TRACE International and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

