The United States Supreme Court just ruled on Thursday in a six to three decision

that the state of South Carolina can keep the gerrymandered districts that it put in place following the 2020 census.

What the South Carolina Republican-led legislature did is they moved 30,000 black voters who used to be able to vote in the first

congressional district held by Maggare Republican Nancy Mace they can no longer vote in the first congressional district.

They've now been moved to vote in other congressional districts in order to try to allow

Maggot Republican-Nancey Mace or a allow Maga Republican Nancy Mason

or a future Maga Republican

to keep that congressional district

under Maga Republican control.

Now the South Carolina Senate legislature tried to justify this process as

saying this was not a racist gerrymander, this was a political gerrymander. This was a political gerrymander and we are allowed

constitutionally to gerrymander congressional districts as part of redistricting based on political grounds.

And so we politically redistricted these congressional districts.

We were not looking at race.

Why?

Just believe us.

We just said this is how we're doing it.

Ultimately, it seems that they were claiming that the politics was a just a subterfuge of the racist

gerrymandering in fact a three-judge federal panel after a trial was held, after evidence was presented, right,

after the full proceedings took place three judges in South Carolina

unanimously found that what the South Carolina legislature did was racist, that it was discriminatory that it was a

violation of the United States Constitution and South Carolina was

...