Welcome to the Advisory Opinions Podcast. This is David Frinch with Sarah Isger and Sarah.

Can you see what I'm doing?

You are holding up some dispatch swag.

I'm drinking a cup of coffee and a brand new dispatch Yeti Tumbler. I don't know yet if

this fine piece of swag is available online yet. It's not.

It is not. It's just a taste of what awaits you and I'm drinking though this cup of coffee

and lamentation. Sarah, in lamentation that once again, the Supreme Court has announced

opinions and I'm at an opinion day and giving us only one opinion and not one of the big

eats. But, well, wait, you held your finger up to stop me.

So I was taking the baby woke up, of course, at five. So I was taking a little pre-AO

nap and my husband came to wake me up just after 10 a.m. and I rolled over and I said,

what did we get? And he said, you got armed career criminal and I threw a pillow at his

face. And he said, but Sarah, the Thomas concurrence.

And I shot out of bed and we shall discuss it.

So okay, the over under on the number of marriages in the United States of America in which,

but the Thomas concurrence could lead to unrestrained glee and jubilation.

Ten? It might just be ours. It might just be yours. Okay. So you're taking the under

on 10 marriages in the United States. Okay. Okay. Well, hopefully we're going to take

the over on 10 on number of listeners interested in the Thomas concurrence because that's what

we're going to start with. Yeah. But we got a lot of other stuff. So there is a case out

of Virginia involving a teacher who went to the school board and while the school board

was considering a pronoun policy and vowed that they would not use preferred pronouns

...