The Spectator combines incisive political analysis with books and arts reviews of Unrivaled Authority.

Subscribe today for just £12 and receive a 12-week subscription in print and online

and get a £20 Amazon gift voucher absolutely free.

Go to spectator.co.uk slash summer.

Hello and welcome to Coffee House Shots. Joining us today is Fraser Nelson and Katie Pools

to discuss those three by-election results. Katie, it's a bit of a mixed picture.

All three main parties won a seat last night. Tell us about it.

Yes, there's something for everyone. I think the sense this morning that we can debate

really how much. If you're looking at the free by-elections, I think the top line is that

Richesonick has managed to avoid a triple by-election defeat and that is because the Tories have

clung on in Oxbridge. The majority was £7,210. That's now been reduced to just 495 votes,

but it means Labour fell short. I think because expectations were almost so low for the Tories and

it was this sense speaking to both Labour and Tories that the Tories won't cause to lose all three,

there is an upset for Keir Starmer and I'm sure we'll talk later about whether that's

alternative. Ules, what it suggests in terms of transferring to the election,

much less good news was Selby and Aitzi and Subitone and Froome. In Selby, you had the Labour

overturn a majority of £20,137. I think historically that's the largest post-war majority that they

have overturned in a by-election and this was also the seat that initially the Tories were the

most optimistic they could try to hold. I think that optimism quickly faded when MPs went to

the constituency and tried to campaign there because it was seen as a safe seat. They were lacking

quite a lot of data in terms of how to campaign there and you quite quickly got the sense,

which we talked about previous on the focus in Oxbridge, they were getting a much better reception

...