Guys, so I'm currently at the old miss, so I'm no longer in Canada, which is a political

refugee from Canada.

So first I wanted to say that, it's great to be at the University of Chicago because I'm

reading right now a book by biography on Thomas Soar, and Of course Thomas Soor was at the University of Chicago.

It's wonderful.

It's certain difference that both these things would be happening.

So I want to give you a bit of a background to how I got into studying

rationality and then the parasitic mind and then suicidal empathy.

My doctoral training is actually in studying

axiomatic rationality, al-a-conman and nursery for those of you. And as a matter of one of my

former professors of Cornell, who then won the Nobel Prize in 2017, was a big failure,

with whom I studied all of this stuff.

So axiomatic rationality would be if I prefer carbate or carb B and I prefer car B to to car C, it has to be that I prefer A to car C.

If I don't do that, I'm being intransitive, therefore I'm being irrational.

Or if I tell you that a hamburger is 90% fat-free or 10% fat, they are is isomorphic statements,

and yet people will judge them as being different.

And the third example, if I ask you to evaluate options A and B separately or together,

it should still yield the same preference.

If I prefer A in one version, I should prefer A in the other, and yet people have reversal of choices.

And so my original training was in studying rationality within this very restrained sense of rationality,

and somatomatic rationality.

But then how do you explain the irrationality of saying that women too, and men too can menstruate,

...