meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Coffee House Shots

Suella Braverman defects – not another one!

Coffee House Shots

The Spectator

News, Daily News, Politics

4.42.2K Ratings

🗓️ 26 January 2026

⏱️ 15 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

It’s psychodrama all round on Coffee House Shots today. Between Andy Burnham – who over the weekend was denied the opportunity to stand in the Gorton and Denton by-election – and Suella Braverman – who has just announced that she’s defecting to Reform (shock horror) – it seems like the main parties are competing to see who can appear the most split. After high-profile Labour MPs gave their support for Burnham’s return, what impact will this have on Labour party unity? And with this latest defection of a former Tory, can Nigel Farage dodge accusations that Reform is becoming the Tory party 2.0?

Isabel Hardman speaks to Tim Shipman and Gabriel Pogrund.

Produced by Oscar Edmondson.


Become a Spectator subscriber today to access this podcast without adverts. Go to spectator.co.uk/adfree to find out more.


For more Spectator podcasts, go to spectator.co.uk/podcasts.


Contact us: podcast@spectator.co.uk


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello and welcome to you, Coffee House Shots, The Spectators Daily Politics Podcast.

0:10.2

I'm Isabel Hardman, and today I'm joined by Tim Shipman and Gabriel Pogrand of the Sunday Times.

0:15.7

Now, we have two big political fights today. One is the fight on the right with the defection of Suella

0:22.1

Braverman to reform. But the other is the big story that has dominated Westminster headlines over

0:27.6

the weekend, the return or not of Andy Burnham to Westminster. Gabriel, let's start with you.

0:35.4

You were covering Andy Burnham's bid to return in the by-election over the weekend.

0:40.8

Just tell us how that played out for you as a reporter.

0:44.5

Well, I'll tell you, it played out as these things often do, namely in ways which

0:50.9

were not wholly helpful for a Sunday newspaper journalist.

0:53.9

But I suppose that wasn't

0:56.0

Andy Burnham's first priority. I will say it occasioned a sudden return to the Labour Party

1:01.8

rule book because as well as examining all the abstruse new rule, which required Burnham to get

1:09.3

the permission of the National Executive Committee. I was

1:11.7

also getting my kind of rebooting my Kremlinology brain and trying to contemplate what would

1:17.7

have happened in the event that there was a five, five split on the NEC officers group making

1:23.3

the decision. And I was quite proud because there were a few people much more schooled

1:29.2

in these matters than me who said they didn't know what would have happened. It may have

1:32.5

fallen to a Shabana Mahmood's casting vote. In the end, we didn't get there. It was an 8-1,

1:38.4

possibly Kirstarmer's last ever landslide victory. And I keep saying that the relationship between Andy Burnham's desire to return to Parliament

1:49.3

and Morgan McSweeney's willingness to let that happen is inversely proportionate.

1:54.0

And there's so many people in Westminster who think of these things in terms of 4D chess

1:59.8

and slightly overcomplicate,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.