meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Who? Weekly

Steph Matto, Jeremy O. Harris & Clayton Echard?

Who? Weekly

Bobby Finger & Lindsey Weber

News, Comedy, Society & Culture, Entertainment News

4.84.9K Ratings

🗓️ 7 January 2022

⏱️ 79 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

It's official: we're stupid and so are you... according to a study published late last year by BMC Psychology. But let's not dwell on our love for celebrity news, let's just enjoy it. On today's episode of Who's There, our weekly call-in show, we play a few comments about hockey, sewers, and A Little Life before accepting questions about Jason Derulo's headline-making hotel fight, a 90 Day Fiancé star's headline-making fart jars, Jeremy O. Harris's connection to Julia Fox and Kanye West, the new bachelor on The Bachelor, "Liquid Dreams," and so much more. Call 619.WHO.THEM to leave questions, comments & concerns, and we may play your call on a future episode. Support us and get a ton of bonus content over on Patreon.com/WhoWeekly and come see us on the final dates of our tour! Tickets at WhoWeekly.us/live. To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Today's episode of Who Weatly is brought to you by the CW. Naomi premieres Tuesday, January 11th,

0:04.5

or you can stream free next day on the CW app.

0:20.0

Welcome to Who Weatly, the podcast where you'll learn everything you need to know about

0:22.4

celebrities you don't, I'm Bobby Finger. I'm Lindsay Weber.

0:26.0

And here's a tweet from the New York Post, celebrity obsessed people are less intelligent

0:30.2

than comma, new study boldly claims. I don't need the post to tell me that, I know that.

0:35.3

You found the study, they linked to the study from BMC psychology.

0:40.2

What's funny is like I proved my true stupidity by reading the page six article,

0:45.5

then going to the study that they linked, which was by the way, inconclusive,

0:49.5

and then like vaguely scanning it to learn exactly how it was inconclusive

0:54.4

and has been inconclusive two times before when other people have tried similar studies.

0:59.2

Who's the idiot now? Also, this study was done with 1763 Hungarian adults,

1:04.9

and it's just so specific. And the New York Post is like, we gotta get on this.

1:09.7

They definitely got an email and we're like, okay, we'll publish this. We can make a good headline

1:13.6

out of this. The conclusion, despite the limitations, the study indicated a week negative association

1:20.0

between celebrity worship and cognitive performance, even after controlling for some relevant

1:24.9

demographic socioeconomic and psychological factors. No, the best conclusion was, however,

1:31.9

the researchers were unable to determine whether celebrity obsessives

1:35.2

performed poorly in cognitive tests because they used their brain power thinking about a list or

1:40.1

whether they were fixated on Hollywood gossip because they were already less intelligent to begin with.

1:44.8

So it's really like, am I stupid because I care about celebrities or do I care about

1:48.8

celebrities because I'm stupid? It's the ultimate chicken in the egg. Seriously.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Bobby Finger & Lindsey Weber, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Bobby Finger & Lindsey Weber and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.