meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Cato Podcast

Steelmanning 101

Cato Podcast

Cato Institute

Cato, Peace, Policy, Politics, Markets, Defense, Government, News, News Commentary, 424708, Immigration, Libertarian

4.5979 Ratings

🗓️ 14 May 2021

⏱️ 16 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Showing respect for an opponent's argument may be difficult, but it's important if we care about having productive and civil discourse. Greg Rehmke runs economicthinking.org and has spend decades teaching young people how to engage in proper debate.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

15 years ago this month the Cato Institute launched the Cato Daily Podcast and to mark the occasion we're hoping to give you a token of our appreciation and ask a small favor.

0:10.0

Visit Cato.org slash CDP15 to get a pair of vinyl Cato Daily Podcast stickers in the mail and

0:17.2

give one of them to a friend who might enjoy timely

0:19.8

libertarian perspectives on issues of the day.

0:22.4

That website again is Cato.org

0:24.2

slash CDP 15 and now more than ever thank you for listening. This is the

0:30.3

Cato Daily podcast for Friday, May 14, 2021.

0:34.0

I'm Caleb Brown.

0:35.2

Engaging in civil discourse means presuming goodwill,

0:38.7

understanding the best version of the opposing argument,

0:42.0

and engaging with that argument directly.

0:45.0

Greg Remke runs Economic Thinking.org.

0:48.0

He's been helping young people prepare for debate for decades,

0:51.0

making sure that liberty is always a key element in policy debates.

0:55.7

In doing so, he's learned a few things about having better discussions with people who disagree

1:00.9

with you.

1:02.0

We spoke last month.

1:03.0

Arnold Kling is somebody that I have enormous respect for and he has put together I guess it's

1:09.7

sort of a fantasy intellectual teams and that is people that you would want to have

1:16.6

arguing on your side of stuff and people that you may disagree with but that you respect on the other sides of issues.

1:25.6

That is they don't engage in a lot of bad argumentation or bad faith argumentation. they take your positions seriously and engage with the substance of those

1:37.7

claims. So to the extent that we want to be like that, we want to be one of those people who is well regarded for making a case

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cato Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Cato Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.