All right, Alexander, let's talk about what is going on in Ukraine, and let's start things off

with Kirstammer's visit to Kiev. We have a 100-year deal, bilateral deal between the UK and Ukraine.

We have in that deal talk statements, statements about the UK having some sort of a military presence in Ukraine, having some sort of a naval present in the Black Sea.

The Kremlin has responded to parts of this bilateral agreement between the UK and Ukraine.

Of course, you have the UK and Kirstammer, once again putting out statements urging the incoming

Trump administration to keep committed to Ukraine, to keep the money flowing to Ukraine,

and it's only through the escalation to Ukraine that the collective West in the United

States will be able to put the Zeletsky regime in a better position for some future

negotiations. Inflict as much damage as you can to Russia and to Putin,

and that way you can put Ukraine in a better position

further down the road for possible negotiations.

That's the argument that they're making to Trump.

And here you have Kirstamaamer, who has now emerged.

He has probably passed Macron, once upon a time it was Macron, but now Kirstammer has emerged

as the number one cheerleader for the war in Ukraine and for the Zeletsky regime.

What are your thoughts?

Absolutely.

Now, I have to say, Starma went to Kiev.

He signed off this document.

It's not actually technically a treaty.

It's more a sort of memorandum of agreement, but it clearly sets out what the ultimate

intentions of the British are.

...