All right, Andrew Kramer of the Star Tribune.

Let's just start out with this, Andrew.

Where'd you stand on Caleb Banks?

Why don't we just begin there?

And then we'll just dive into everything else of the Vikings draft.

But the most interesting thing they did was on day one, the thing that the draft

analysts are discussing and the consensus board people are fighting on the internet over.

He was one of those reaches, if you will.

So what was your sense of the decision to go with, I think, one of the more risky picks

in the 2026 amateur NFL draft.

Yeah, this pick obviously was a surprise to me, much like it was everybody else.

You know, it's a guy that's ranked like 50 first on Daniel Jeremiah's final 150.

And yeah, even he was saying that there might not be any first round defensive tackles taken.

And so if you take the Vikings at their word that they were taking their best player available,

which is always a murky thing because they're going to have them all, you know,

horizontally stacked.

But if you take them at their word, then they really must have viewed this draft as not having

much top power, you know, much of a hierarchy at the top,

much like the discussion was for months leading up to this. If this was a bad draft, there

might not even be 32 first round grades for many of these teams on these guys. And if that's the case,

if the Vikings viewed it that way and he truly was the best player, then boy, there weren't

many sure things that

...