meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Best of the Spectator

Spectator Out Loud: Jessica Douglas-Home, Paul Wood, Andrew Watts

Best of the Spectator

The Spectator

News Commentary, News, Daily News, Society & Culture

4.4785 Ratings

🗓️ 26 June 2021

⏱️ 23 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

On this week's episode, Jessica Douglas-Home wants to know why modern British architecture is just so ugly. (01:03) After, Paul Wood warns what Western withdrawal means for Afghanistan (09:23) and finally Andrew Watts explores the history of the ever-updated Pride flag. (19:23)

Presented by Cindy Yu

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

The Spectator is searching for the UK's brightest entrepreneurs to enter the Spectator Economic Innovator of the Year Awards in partnership with Charles Stanley wealth managers.

0:10.4

If you have a business that disrupts an existing market, a smart new way of doing things, or something that has incredible social impact, then apply by 1st of July at spectator.co.uk forward slash innovator.

0:27.6

Hello and welcome to Spectator Outloud. Every week a few of our favourite writers read out their

0:36.9

pieces in the latest issue.

0:38.3

This week, we hear from Jessica Douglas' home, the founder of the Mihay Eminescu Trust,

0:43.3

a foundation to preserve Europe's cultural heritage of medieval villages, and she asks,

0:48.3

why is modern architecture just so ugly? We'll also be joined by Paul Wood, who writes about the Taliban's resurgence in

0:55.5

Afghanistan as the Americans prepare to withdraw. And finally, Andrew Watts reads his notes on

1:02.1

pride flags. First is Jessica Douglas home. In Cheshim and Amersham last week, Tory voters punished

1:09.2

the government, not only for building on greenfield sites,

1:13.4

but for allowing the construction of too many ugly, badly designed buildings.

1:19.0

The British public have fed up with modern architecture. Despite polls that prove this time and

1:25.1

time again, architects simply ignore people's views. Indeed, if the

1:30.3

public has the temerity to criticise their latest works, there is uproar, as I've discovered to my

1:36.2

cost. At a dinner in late 2019, I asked Norman Foster, this architect of such things as London's widely derided City Hall and the Berlin Reichstag, if he was pleased by the government's new building better, building beautiful commission.

1:55.7

The commission's mission was to tackle the challenge of poor quality design and build of homes and places across the country

2:03.0

and to ensure popular consent. It was chaired by the late Sir Roger Scruton.

2:10.2

How wrong I was to assume that Foster would applaud the initiative. Refusing to discuss it,

2:16.9

he lost his temper, spewed ridicule on

2:19.2

scrutiny and stomped away. But Foster's response is not unusual. The chasm is widening

2:27.1

between what people want to enhance our cities, our countryside and our lives and what architects

2:33.2

are giving us.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.