You are listening to the Jordan is my lawyer podcast. This is your host, Jordan, and I give you the legal analysis you've been waiting for.

Here's the deal. I don't care about your political views, but I do ask that you listen to the facts,

have an open mind, and think for yourselves. Deal? Oh, and one last thing? I'm not actually

your lawyer.

Welcome back to the Jordan is my lawyer podcast,

your favorite source of unbiased news and legal analysis.

This episode is specifically dedicated to a case called Harper versus Hall,

otherwise known at the Supreme Court level as Moore versus Harper.

This is a North Carolina Supreme Court case that made its way up to the

Supreme Court of the United States, but there is now question as to whether the Supreme Court will even make a decision on this case.

This case made a lot of headlines last summer.

It's an important case, which is why I'm doing a special episode on it.

Every so often, there are special current events

or special Supreme Court rulings where I will do an episode dedicated specifically to that.

So this is a case with a lot of layers.

There's a lot to it, but I am going to break it down for you, like I usually do. So before we get into it, let me just remind you per usual.

If you could please leave me a review on whatever platform you listen, it would be so so appreciated. It really helps support my show. I also did want to give you an update from the last episode. So on Tuesday I discussed the Montana lawmaker Zoe Zephyr who filed a lawsuit against the state

following her censure so she was censured from the House of Representatives in

Montana after she spoke out in opposition against a bill that banned gender affirming care.

She is a transgender herself and the house called for her censure.

So she is no longer allowed to debate on the house floor for this session.

The 2023 session that is, so she filed a lawsuit asking the court to enjoin the state from being able to enforce certain provisions of that censure

...