The following is the audio version of a video released at peak prosperity.com.

Visit peakprosperity.com to watch the video and to find other insightful content,

such as articles, discussion forums, and exclusive subscriber-only content.

Folks, I think we've got some solutions here to the chart. and exclusive subscriber-only content.

Folks, I think we've got some solutions here to the Charlie Kirk assassination.

First, there's not a chance in the world that Tyler Robinson could have taken the kill shot,

and two, that kill shot was a high-velocity rifle round that ended up in Charlie's body.

I'm going to show you how I got to that conclusion.

Hello, everyone. I am Dr. Chris Martinson of Peak Prosperity here with a very special report for all of y'all.

We're going to be talking about this today. We've got a new video to analyze here, which I think very conclusively solves a lot of questions.

I know there's been a lot of speculation about what happened, what didn't happen, was he wearing body armor, was he shot from the right, was he shot with a pistol, was it an exploding mic? We're going to take care of all of that today. But first, we're going to have to start by setting up the scene so that we can all share a common understanding. Now, just to be absolutely clear, if you're not familiar with me, I did a lot of work on the Butler Pennsylvania assassination attempt and murder of Corey Compitour. I looked at a lot of

the sound files there. Here's how I work. I will gather all the data I possibly can. And then once I have

that data, I'm going to try and see if it fits to a hypothesis. And if it doesn't work, I'll reject the hypothesis. But I'm very diligent about this. You can ask my team. Anybody who knows me, I will go over the data, over it, over it. I'll get all the way to the point of feeling like I have it all resolved. That happened multiple points over the past eight days while I was analyzing what I'm going to share with you today.

And I had to reject three separate conclusions that I'd come to because it just didn't fit or new data came out.

That's how I roll.

All of this could be revised tomorrow too if brand new data comes out.

But let me walk you through how I got here and what I'm thinking.

For those of you who like logical, deductive, methodical sorts of explanations and explorations, you're going to love this because that's who I am. If you want hyperbolic stuff with a lot of sensationalism, I'm not your guy, but I am going to get you to a place of where we're going to both learn what happened here and learn some things along the way.

I should also probably tell you that I am a gun affectionato. I've been shooting for well over 40 years at this point in time.

I've probably shot a half a million rounds. None of that means anything. There's a lot of people who shoot a lot of guns who still don't understand ballistics, still don't understand what happens in a human body.

My background, my PhD from Duke University's in pathology, subspecialty toxicology. So yes, I've conducted autopsies. I'm familiar with the human body and I'm familiar with guns.

And I know a little bit about ballistics, but we're going to see if we can put this together deductively together and come to some sort of a conclusion.

...