Smashmouth incrementalism at the polls.

April 10, 2024.

Introduction.

So a couple of days ago, Donald Trump announced his stance on abortion.

He declined to go for a national abortion ban saying that the issue should be left to the

individual states. In addition he also affirmed the standard issues safer politicians

pro-life stance which includes room for abortion and cases of rape, incest, and the

life of the mother. On top of that the Arizona Supreme Court just decided that an 1864 law, which

constitutes a near total ban on abortion, is enforceable. This is sure to inflame

the left and is likely to juice turnout for Biden.

Trump's vacillation on abortion is sure to inflame the right and is likely to juice absolutely

nothing because the right has nowhere to go.

We glance to the right of Trump eager to cast our vote for the pure candidate over there,

and it turns out that he's not running.

Again.

And this is why we should be able to see how the times are crying out

for more detailed discussion on the absolute need for smash mouth incrementalism.

The time is ripe for the kind of clarity that only smash mouth incremental thinking can

provide.

Interested, stick with me.

Quick definition.

On the abortion issue, an abolitionist is someone who does not want to chip away at our

...