It's time to go back to our mail bag and answer some more feedback sent in by listeners.

Today we've got some questions challenging the conclusions in a few episodes that

dealt with environmental matters.

We're going to respond to some questions about environmental plutonium, about the mythical

wind turbine syndrome, and even fracking, plus lots more.

And that's coming right up on Skeptoid.

You're listening to Skeptoid.

I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.

Listener feedback, the environment.

Few topics generate as much passionate feedback as those dealing with environmental issues.

This may be because so many environmentally issues are so politically charged.

If I say solar power is better than coal, I get accolades from the left and vitriol

from the right.

If I say nuclear energy is better than coal, I get accolades from the right and vitriol

from the left.

This is why I long ago gave up trying to please any particular segment of the audience.

I just call it as I see it.

Sometimes this works out well, and sometimes it doesn't.

The feedback I'm going to answer today comes from both camps.

My episode comparing the Fukushima, Chernobyl, and 3 mile island disasters brought out the

expected competing camps, the pro-NUX and the anti-NUX.

There was also a considerable amount of good information about radioactivity in the comments,

...