Worried about your future in tech?

Master new skills.

Accelerate your team's impact and redefine what's possible with plural site.

We're more than just another online learning platform.

We're shattering the skills gap and shaping future generations of technologists.

Transform your work. Transform your work.

Transform your team.

Ready to tap in?

Visit us at pluralsight.com to learn more.

President Trump's reciprocal tariffs get a rough ride in the highest of courts.

I'm David Bruncatchew in Los Angeles. U.S. Supreme Court

justices yesterday heard the arguments and asked questions about whether an emergency powers law

from back when disco was first hitting the charts can be used by a president to overhaul international

trade and raise taxes without getting Congress to go along. I spoke this morning with

Jess Braven, Supreme Court correspondent for the Wall Street Journal who listened to every word

yesterday. I asked him if justices were buying what the administration was selling.

No, they weren't. And it was interesting to hear them talk about it because, you know, we've

been going for months with a bunch of

unexplained emergency orders that have largely gone the administration's way. So to hear the

justices grilling Solicitor General John Sauer and really having skeptical questions about the

administration's position was a reminder that the Supreme Court does take these cases one by one,

and it's not a slam dunk, even for a president who has gotten so far pretty much everything he's asked for.

...