SIO142: Andrews Seidel and Torrez on Masterpiece Cakeshop

Serious Inquiries Only

Thomas Smith

News, News Commentary, Politics

4.6 • 1.1K Ratings

🗓️ 7 June 2018

⏱️ 65 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

It's a coven of Andrews! We had so much to talk about regarding the Masterpiece Cakeshop decision handed down by the Supreme Court recently, that we had to do some overflow from Opening Arguments! These two expert Andrews are here to break it down for us, including how many different ways Dave Rubin is wrong about this. (It's a lot). Leave Thomas a voicemail! (916) 750-4746, remember short and to the point! Support the show at seriouspod.com/support! Follow us on Twitter: @seriouspod Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/seriouspod For comments, email thomas@seriouspod.com

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	You're listening to serious inquiries only. Oh, Hello and welcome to serious inquiries only this is episode 142 I'm your host Thomas Smith and I am so excited to have
0:36.4	Not one Andrew not two Andrews, but two Andrews
0:42.3	I joke like there's a good three three but no it's still just two.
0:46.4	Two Andrews here and they are two of the top Andrews in all of Andrew Dum.
0:49.7	They are of course Andrew Torres, how you doing Andrew?
0:52.1	I am fantastic. I am happy to be the
0:54.8	the second best Andrew on the podcast. Oh that's so nice. And Andrew Seidell of
1:00.7	FFRF who I don't you haven't been on this show, right?
1:04.0	That I?
1:05.0	No, I've not. Okay, I didn't think so.
1:06.0	This is my first time.
1:07.0	I've been wanting to have you on, I'm very excited.
1:08.0	So Andrew, how you doing?
1:10.0	I'm doing well. It's also nice to be the second best Andrew on this show.
1:13.0	Two Andrews, each better than the other.
1:17.0	And, no, we, so we started this conversation over on opening arguments,
1:21.0	and there's just so much to talk about and there's a lot more for this show that we can get into that's more secular community related that you know is not necessarily what we do over on opening arguments so I thought it would be perfect to kind of continue that on.
1:35.0	The first thing I really want to ask,
1:37.0	so sorry, I should summarize just in case you're coming over fresher,
1:41.0	you haven't heard it, go listen to opening arguments that will be
1:44.0	episode 180 that Andrew Seidell is on talking about the results of the
1:49.8	masterpiece cake shop case go check it out right now before you do anything.
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Thomas Smith, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Thomas Smith and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.