meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Standard Issue Podcast

SIM Ep 884 Chops 268: Caroline Moran and the never-ending hen do

Standard Issue Podcast

Standard Issue

Society & Culture

4.71.1K Ratings

🗓️ 20 August 2023

⏱️ 30 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Henpocalypse! hit our screens this week, so Hannah's been on the phone with its writer and creator, Caroline Moran, to talk about the end of the world, hen parties and why hen parties sometimes feel like the end of the world. They also chat about big families, babysitting, working class characters on TV and why sometimes Danny Dyer is the only man for the job. Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/standardissuespodcast. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello there Hannah here and welcome to this week's Sunday Chops. I know we've got some stiff competition

0:19.7

for your attention today given the lionesses are in the World Cup final. If you're listening

0:24.6

to this beforehand I hope it's a distraction from all the nerves and if you're listening

0:29.3

to it afterwards I hope this is coming to you in a world where we've won. This week I'm

0:35.6

chatting to the writer Caroline Moran about her new BBC sitcom Hempocalypse. We talk about

0:42.6

a whole lot of stuff including hem parties, working class women on telly and why if you

0:48.5

need someone to play Danny Dyer only the real Danny Dyer will do I'll let you get on

0:53.8

with it until next time. Hi Hannah here I am joined by Caroline Moran welcome to

1:04.1

standard issue. Thank you I'm delighted to be here nice to talk to you Hannah. Now we're

1:08.5

talking on Thursday morning this is going out on Sunday but we're talking on Thursday

1:12.2

morning Hempocalypse launched this week. How's that failing? Are you a read the reviews

1:18.2

person or are you a height from the reviews person? I am a height from the reviews person

1:24.6

whilst also sort of being inevitably curious so my idea is people go the reviews are in

1:31.8

a negrate and then I don't have to know any more than that but I feel like for me reviews

1:37.5

are a bit mentally destabilizing so I tend to keep away from them but they're all mainly

1:44.2

good so far I believe so which is the best because I don't have to engage but also know

1:49.6

that it's good. I haven't read any either partly because I just don't think they're particularly

1:55.3

helpful before you do an interview but I know loads and loads and loads of people in the

1:59.6

arts who just don't bother or do it a year or two later and then think what was I worrying

2:03.8

about all the reviews were great. I think it all still does hang on who reviews it and

2:09.5

there are way way way too many men still reviewing. I think I think the proportion of men

2:16.4

reviewing women's writing is too high still. Yeah and especially in comedy I think because

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Standard Issue, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Standard Issue and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.