meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Practical Stoicism

Silence Is Not Always Complicity

Practical Stoicism

Tanner Campbell

Self-improvement, Philosophy, Society & Culture, Education

4.7723 Ratings

🗓️ 17 April 2026

⏱️ 19 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Stoic Journaling 50% OFF - Use code EASTER50 - https://stoicjournaling.com

--

Live in Leicester? Join me live on May the 23rd: https://tannerocampbell.com/events/stoicism-a-complete-framework-for-living-a-good-life

--

In this episode, I explore the idea that “silence is complicity” and whether that claim holds up under Stoic scrutiny.

This phrase gets used as a kind of moral pressure—an attempt to force speech or action by implying that not speaking is equivalent to endorsing wrongdoing. But Stoicism doesn’t deal in slogans like this. It deals in judgment. It asks: what is appropriate for me, given my role, my knowledge, and the situation in front of me?

Sometimes speaking is the right thing to do. Sometimes it is not. The Stoic position is not that silence is always justified, nor that speech is always required, but that both must be evaluated through reason.

One of the problems with slogans like “silence is complicity” is that they bypass this process entirely. They encourage immediate assent to an impression—“something is wrong, therefore I must speak”—without first testing whether that impression is accurate, whether one understands the situation, or whether speaking will actually improve anything.

From a Stoic perspective, speaking without understanding can be just as irresponsible as remaining silent when action is required. Both are failures of judgment.

So the real question isn’t whether silence is complicity. The real question is: what is the just and appropriate response here? That requires slowing down, examining the impression, and being honest about what you do and do not know.

It also requires considering your role. Not every situation calls for your voice. Not every issue falls within your responsibility. And not every demand for speech is made in good faith.

That doesn’t mean you default to silence. It means you earn your speech. You speak when you have reasoned your way to the conclusion that speaking is the appropriate action—and you remain silent when that same process leads you elsewhere.

The takeaway is straightforward. Don’t outsource your moral judgment to slogans. Whether you speak or remain silent, make sure it is the result of clear reasoning, not social pressure.

Listening on Spotify? Leave a comment! Share your thoughts.

I am a public philosopher, it is my only job. I am enabled to do this job, in large part, thanks to support from my listeners and readers. You can support my work, keep it independent and online, at ⁠https://stoicismpod.com/members⁠

Looking for more Stoic content? Consider my 3x/week newsletter "Stoic Brekkie": ⁠https://stoicbrekkie.com⁠

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome back for Copton. I'm so glad that you're here, and I'm glad to be back in the saddle of doing this, normal episodes and such. The tour kind of took me off of doing that for a few weeks. And, you know, that's nice. It's nice to take a break. But it's also nice to be back to work on doing the work. So before I start today, real quick, the Easter sale for the journaling program

0:21.3

is still going on, 50% off. Use the code Easter 50% off, which I believe brings the price

0:28.7

from 72 pounds down to 36 pounds. So a lot more affordable. I'm keeping it that way until the 1st of May.

0:36.7

Second, I am officially going on a really big tour, a workshop tour across 20 cities in the UK. I'm starting in Lester. So if you are in Lester or in Lestershire and you're interested in attending the first talk, I'll be having it at the Secular Society. It's a half day. It's on Saturday, May 23rd. It will include lunch. You'll get a journal to take home and you will actually get access to the journaling program as a benefit of having attended that workshop. Again, there are going to be 20 of these. I'm still figuring out venues, but I have some soft commitments from all 20 across the next 40 weeks. So I'll be doing

1:12.2

one of these live workshops every other week for 40 weeks, which is wild. I'm very excited to be

1:19.2

doing it. I just feel great about going around talking to people about this. And I've found a way

1:22.9

to make it economically viable for me to do, give a lot of benefit, like include lunch in the workshops,

1:28.1

give things away in the workshop. I've found a way to make that happen. So as long as I can put the butts in the seats, hey, it's good. So there'll be more about that as perhaps I get the actual dates and all that worked out. But for now, just know it's coming up. And if you live in Lester or Lester Shear or even in Nottingham and you want to make the trip up. There is a link in the

1:47.1

description of this episode that you can just see the one tour stop that is currently listed on my website. And if you like, you can register for it if there are any seats left. Now, with that, we're going to start today's episode. It's about the idea of silence being

2:02.2

complicity, this idea that if you are not loud about an issue or if you don't speak out

2:07.9

about an issue, you're automatically implicated in it as being part of the problem.

2:12.9

I've had this on my mind for a long time, years. I've never really liked the concept. I think it's an impractical concept to hold. It's an impractical position to hold. Ethically speaking, it doesn't hold water, I don't think. And I'm going to talk a little bit about why I think that is. But I want you to know that it wasn't my idea to come up with this episode. In fact, I had recently, in the last, let's say, three months or so,

2:35.8

two months or so, started a substack called Dear Tanner, where people who were following my work,

2:41.7

either here on the podcast or the writing I do through Stoic Brecki or anywhere else, that they

2:46.1

could write in with their personal questions, I'd anonymize them, and I'd respond to them

2:49.9

and try to give some, you know, try to give some advice. Now, unfortunately, I'd anonymize them, and I'd respond to them and try to give some,

2:51.1

you know, try to give some advice. Now, unfortunately, I chose substack to do that, and I've become

2:56.1

aware of problematic issues with substacks since doing that, so the substack won't remain,

3:02.1

which is why I'm not going to share a link to it in the show notes. But I would like to ask if any of you have alternatives

3:09.8

for like blogging that aren't Substack and please aren't WordPress because I really don't want

3:15.3

to go through the process of like paying for a WordPress or hosting a WordPress and all the

3:19.1

work that comes along with it. But if you have a blogging platform that you'd like to suggest

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Tanner Campbell, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Tanner Campbell and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.