4.5 • 2.1K Ratings
🗓️ 18 August 2023
⏱️ 51 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Hi, everybody, and welcome to Open to Debate. |
0:04.3 | I'm John Donovan. |
0:05.3 | We are at the Aspen Ideas Festival for this episode, and we are taking on a question |
0:09.6 | of memory. |
0:10.6 | Now, there is a technology coming into focus right now that once belonged only to science |
0:16.2 | fiction. |
0:17.2 | It's the ability to use neurofeedback to alter or erase memory on purpose, basically |
0:23.2 | to hack your brain. |
0:24.8 | You have a memory, you want it gone, now it's gone. |
0:28.7 | So what is the case for something like that? |
0:31.4 | Well, one would be when a painful memory keeps interfering with your life, for example, |
0:35.4 | PTSD. |
0:36.4 | But critics raise all kinds of concerns about unwanted side effects, including losing a sense |
0:41.6 | of who you are if you're past and what you know of your past can be so easily edited |
0:46.0 | and rearranged. |
0:47.5 | So science and some philosophy in this one, as we debate this question, should we erase |
0:53.2 | bad memories? |
0:54.2 | Let's meet the debater of answering, yes, the author of the battle for your brain |
0:58.6 | and defending the right to think freely in an age of neuro-technology, Duke University |
1:03.2 | professor, director of the Duke Initiative for Science and Society, need a fire, honey. |
1:07.5 | Thanks so much. |
1:10.5 | And arguing no, that we should not erase bad memory, senior reporter for Vox Future Perfect |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Open to Debate, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Open to Debate and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.