Should We Dismantle the Family?
Breakpoint
Colson Center
4.8 • 2.8K Ratings
🗓️ 13 May 2021
⏱️ 6 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Last fall, the Black Lives Matter organization quietly deleted a section of its website in which it professed an intention to: "disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement." The statement was removed after public backlash, but the sentiment behind the statement seems to endure among some activists.
Earlier this week, The National Council on Family Relations hosted a webinar entitled "Toward Dismantling Family Privilege and White Supremacy in Family Science." According to researchers, structures of public life in the United States—such as government support, healthcare, and education—that implicitly advantage nuclear families (two people committed to by marriage raising children) disadvantage other family arrangements. For these scholars, this is an example of privilege rooted in white supremacy.
These scholars are correct in noting that families with a married mom and dad raising their children tend to fare better. In fact, kids with married parents are far less likely to experience poverty, social problems, emotional problems, and even incarceration. The problem is why these outcomes exist.
A Christian worldview contends that these benefits are inherent to a nuclear family because it is God's design for the family. Stronger bonds, better social outcomes, better health, and higher rates of happiness are more common in the context of these relationships because that is how He created humans to do life together. Within a worldview that sees everything in terms of oppressor/oppression, these outcomes must be the results of a system that advantages some and disadvantages others.
This increasingly influential worldview is derived from Marxist philosophy, which denies the idea of a given "human nature." Human behavior, Marx believed, is determined by the structures (particularly the economic structures) of a society. These structures tend to be oppressive. So, if the nuclear family tends to be the given arrangement of the bourgeoisie, it is bad by definition and oppresses other arrangements.
What's not considered are the implications if there is such a design to human relationships, given by our Creator. For example, the nuclear family works for the good of women. No amount of webinars on "dismantling family privilege" can erase the fact that women exclusively bear children and women are disproportionately disadvantaged when families break down and they are left to care for children on their own.
Why would these webinar scholars want to disadvantage women on purpose?
Of course, those who wish to "dismantle" the nuclear family would agree that women raising children need support. If the most natural and obvious source of that support is old-fashioned, oppressive and dismantled, then this support must come from somewhere else. Obviously then, this becomes the state: a disastrously poor substitute for family.
This reminds me of a progressive woman who tweeted: "If abortion is illegal then men abandoning their child should also be illegal. If this was a permanent decision for me then it is for you as a father also." To which someone replied: "Congratulations, you invented marriage."
Eliminating families as antiquated or even (somehow) racist is not merely illogical for pragmatic reasons. It's cultural suicide. It's an idea that sociologist and philosopher Philip Rieff might call a "deathwork," one that exclusively tears down. It cannot build anything. It offers nothing in place of the family.
Accordingly, we can and must distinguish between helping those in tragic family situations and incentivizing these situations as "alternative family arrangements." The answer is to recognize the truth about reality, truth that is available not only in Scripture but in everything we know about how families function and work. The goal is to do family better and to welcome more people into it, not to dismantle it.
The Church should be the loudest voice celebrating and defending marriage and the family as God intended it. To do so is not to make an idol of it, as some claim, but to point to what is true and good. The church of today lives by lies when it pretends that God's design isn't important. We can celebrate this very good gift of God while also encouraging and supporting single parents and children in other situations. We can walk and chew gum at the same time. Indeed, we must.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Is the nuclear family an oppressive social construct, or is it an essential part of God's |
| 0:05.6 | good design for our lives together? |
| 0:08.1 | For the Colson Center, I'm John Stone Street. |
| 0:10.4 | This is Breakpoint. |
| 0:13.3 | Last fall, the Black Lives Matter organization quickly deleted a section off its website |
| 0:18.5 | in which they professed their intention to, and I quote, |
| 0:23.2 | disrupt the Western prescribed nuclear family structure requirement. |
| 0:27.6 | That statement was removed after some public backlash, but it seems that the sentiment behind |
| 0:32.7 | the statement endorsed, at least with some activist. |
| 0:36.2 | Earlier this week, the National Council on Family Relations hosted a webinar entitled |
| 0:40.7 | Toward Dismantling Family Privilege and White Supremacy and Family Science. |
| 0:45.7 | According to some researchers, structures of public life in the United States, |
| 0:49.6 | like government support, health care, and education, implicitly advantage nuclear families. Two people committed to marriage |
| 0:57.2 | raising children. And that means they disadvantage other family arrangements. According to these scholars, |
| 1:03.9 | this is an example of privilege that's rooted in white supremacy. Now, these scholars are correct, |
| 1:09.3 | of course, and noting how families with a married mom and |
| 1:12.2 | dad raising children do tend to fare better. In fact, kids raised by their married parents do way better. |
| 1:19.3 | They're far less likely to experience poverty, social problems, emotional problems, even incarceration. |
| 1:25.9 | Now, the question is, why do these outcomes exist? According to a |
| 1:31.3 | Christian worldview, these benefits are inherent to a nuclear family because this is God's created |
| 1:36.8 | designed for the family. Stronger bonds, better social outcomes, better health, higher rates of happiness, |
| 1:43.2 | these are more common in the context |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Colson Center, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Colson Center and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

