meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

Shavaun Scott on the Guthrie Kidnapping Silence and Richins Murder Psychology

True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

Tony Brueski

News, True Crime, News Commentary

4.2612 Ratings

🗓️ 27 February 2026

⏱️ 53 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Two cases demanding psychological analysis. One expert providing the answers.

Nancy Guthrie has been missing for three weeks. Her kidnapper hasn't communicated once—no demands, no ransom, no proof she's alive. The silence is total. What does it mean?

Eric Richins reportedly told people his wife was trying to poison him. He took protective measures—lawyers, insurance changes, asset protection. Then he stayed married to her. Prosecutors allege Kouri killed him with fentanyl after multiple attempts.

Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins True Crime Today for comprehensive analysis of both cases. With over thirty years working with victims and perpetrators of violence, Scott examines what the behavioral evidence reveals.

On Guthrie: The psychology of kidnappers who don't communicate. In hostage situations, silence isn't neutral—it's evidence. What does three weeks of nothing suggest about the perpetrator's psychology and the case's trajectory?

On Richins Part 1: Inside the mind of a partner who allegedly chooses murder. How does killing become the "rational" choice? We analyze the language, the method, and the alleged performance of grief that followed.

On Richins Part 2: The victim's experience. Why someone might take protective steps but not leave. How the isolation of an unbelievable suspicion keeps victims trapped. What warning signs others should recognize.

This is the full interview—expert psychological insight into criminal silence, partner homicide, and the forces that make the unthinkable happen.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#NancyGuthrie #KouriRichins #EricRichins #ShavaunScott #TrueCrimeToday #CriminalPsychology #KidnapperSilence #SpouseMurder #VictimPsychology #DomesticHomicide

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is Hidden Killers with Tony Bruske.

0:03.2

Here now, Tony Bruske.

0:07.7

Forget the backpack.

0:09.4

Forget the gloves.

0:10.7

The real question of the Nancy Guthrie case is one nobody can answer yet.

0:14.6

Why has a person who took her said absolutely nothing?

0:20.0

It's assuming the ransom notes, the TMZ noise, we'll call it that to be nice, is all nothing.

0:30.1

Why has a person who took her said absolutely nothing?

0:32.2

No contact with the family, no demands, no negotiation, just three weeks of silence,

0:36.3

four weeks now.

0:39.3

The ransom notes are noise, opportunist, not the perpetrator. So what kind of mind takes an 84-year-old woman,

0:45.8

and then goes completely dark? That's what we're unpacking today with psychotherapist and author

0:51.7

Chavon Scott. Chavon, as always, welcome.

0:55.8

Let's dive into this angle of the conversation

0:59.1

without all the noise of TMZ and this and that and Nanos.

1:04.0

When someone abducts a person and makes no attempt to leverage them,

1:09.9

no communication, no demands, no engagement. What is that

1:14.3

silence typically represents psychologically? Is this about control, shame, or something else entirely?

1:21.0

It's really hard to say, you know, we're all speculating, but it doesn't seem like with no ransom

1:26.7

demand at this point, it doesn't seem like

1:29.6

perhaps there was ever meant to be that kind of leverage, that it was never about financial gain

1:35.1

for them. And so then we get into what would other motivations be, and perhaps the simplest one is that

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Tony Brueski, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Tony Brueski and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.