Every year, men spend billions of dollars to look at women with little clothing on,

such as the annual sports illustrated swimsuit issue,

or with no clothing on such as on internet sites and in so-called men's magazines.

Women, on the other hand, spend virtually nothing to see unclothed men.

Why?

Some say that the reason is that men are socialized interviewing women as sex objects,

and that women are socialized into not viewing men as sex objects.

But if that's true, how do these people explain gay men?

They are as aroused by pictures of naked men, as heterosexual men are aroused by pictures of naked women.

Obviously, then, it's not socialization.

It's that men are programmed by nature, not by society, to respond sexually to the visual.

This is an area in which men are so different from women that it's probably impossible.

No, not probably, just outright impossible, for a woman to truly understand.

Of course, women find some men attractive,

and of course a woman can have an intense reaction to seeing a very appealing man.

But there's still no comparison.

The visual alone arouses men.

It takes far more to arouse a woman than seeing naked men.

If that's all it took, most husbands would walk around the house naked whenever possible,

or at least every time they wanted sex.

And the average heterosexual man is excited countless times a day simply by seeing women,

in person, on billboards and magazines, on television, and even in his imagination.

...