I think we have a clear, historic choice here. Why is that? If we negotiate with Iran, and let's assume, do we get a good deal? Even no enrichment, which is the essence of a good nuclear deal, therefore they can't produce a nuclear weapon. Let's say we even got further than that. No ballistic missiles or limited ballistic missiles and no support for proxies.

Those two issues I just mentioned, likely are not on a table.

Let's assume we even got that far.

And we have a deal.

What does that do?

That extends the life of this regime indefinitely.

It's true. Why would we do that? Especially when we already pledged support for the protesters

in the street. He said, don't hang them. They didn't. They shot them. 30 to 50,000 dead.

Now they're rebuilding their nuclear program. They put huge roofs over them. The Natanz

building.

And nobody thinks they haven't stopped building ballistic missiles. And they threatened to

assassinate our president. And they still have an ongoing threat on Mike Pompeo, as well as

John Bolton. And I think Brian Hook. Senator Mark Wayne Mullen knows all about the danger of Iran.

But he also noted that there are so many Gulf states that are

allies of ours who don't want us to attack and take out the Revolutionary Guard and or the

Ayatollah. What's the right thing to do? What are we going to do? Senator Mark Wayne Mullen,

welcome back. Thank you. Thanks for having me on. Brian. You know, it's a good question because when you start looking at our options,

what we don't want is Iran to become a vacuum for ISIS or al-Qaeda or the Taliban or even Turkey.

Think about the rich reserves that the Iranian people have underneath their feet. In fact, a lot of people think

that Iran has better reserves than even Saudi Arabia, but yet the people are depressed and in

great poverty because of, you know, the Ayatollah and they stronghold that they have used that money

instead of for the people to create terrorism

...