Trump files a massive lawsuit, a class action lawsuit against the digital media corporations.

What are the merits of that lawsuit? I'll get into it.

And as Michael Avenatti gets ready for prison, I have a couple of tips for him, including

when not to pick up the soap. This is the Dineshtus is a podcast.

America needs this voice. The times are crazy and the time of confusion, division, and

lies. We need a brave voice of reason, understanding, and truth. This is the Dineshtus

is a podcast. Trump has filed a massive class action lawsuit against the digital media companies,

Twitter, specifically, and Facebook. And the fact that it's a class action suit means it's not

just on Trump's behalf, it's on behalf of the whole class of people, actually us,

who are being restricted, censored, banned, shadow banned, tagged, flagged in various ways

by the social media moguls. Now, Alan Dorschowitz, the former Harvard Law School professor,

prominent attorney, thinks that this could be a landmark First Amendment case. Listen.

This is the most important First Amendment case of the 21st century, and it's important because

it pits freedom of speech on the one hand against the First Amendment. On the other hand,

that may sound paradoxical, but remember, it's the high-tech giants that are banning freedom of speech.

They are censoring, but they're claiming the right to do so under the First Amendment. So,

they're using the First Amendment as a sword against freedom of speech. So, Dorschowitz here,

I think, is making a sophisticated point, which is to say that these digital media platforms are

rallying behind the First Amendment, the First Amendment, by the way, which restricts

government action, particularly congressional action, against free speech. And they're saying

we are exercising free speech. So, the paradox here, which I think Dorschowitz is highlighting,

is that they're invoking the First Amendment to suppress speech. They're saying it's our platform,

...