Coming up, I mentioned yesterday the Supreme Court an important ruling on

non-destrimination against religious families, and I'll talk about the decision today.

Debbie's going to join me. We're going to talk about a topic that came up at the Texas GOP convention, which is

should Texas secede from the Union? Can it? Is it legal?

Actor Nick Sirisley joins me. We're going to talk about his film about January 6th, and also about conservative

filmmaking. This is the Dineshtas' show.

The Supreme Court just issued an important decision. It's Carson versus Maiken.

And it's a decision that arises out of Maine. I've talked about the case before, but the court

very good decision, six to three, with all the six conservatives on the one side, the three

familiar leftist briar, sort of my Orrin Kagan, in descent. And it all revolves around an argument

about separation of church and state. An argument that is, I think, itself based on the misnomer,

but I'll get to that. Here's what's going on. The state of Maine, apparently Maine does not have a

fully functional public school system throughout the state. And so what Maine does is they offer

tuition assistance, basically kind of a voucher or scholarships for parents in districts that

don't have their own public school. And what they tell these parents is you can choose a school

and send your child to any school of your choice. So it's basically a private school voucher

program offering the same benefit that parents get who send their kids to public schools.

Now, until 1981, parents in Maine could use these vouchers to send their child to a private

or a private religious school. But in 1981, based upon an interpretation of separation of church

and state, the Maine Attorney General basically said, you can't use public funding to fund

scholarships that go to religious institutions. And so Maine going all the way back to 1981,

stopped funding parents sending their kids to religious schools. And this is the case that is now

...