helping to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity. This is the Constitution Study on the America Out Loud Network with your host, Paul Engle.

We probably all know that the Fourth Amendment protects our right to be secure from unreasonable

searches and seizures. We also know that

law enforcement generally needs a warrant before they can search your property. But what happens

when those search warrants go wrong? Hello there, everyday Americans. Paul Engel here with

the Constitution study where we read and study the Constitution, teach the rise in generation

be free. Glad you could join us today. We're going to spend the day talking about, well,

primarily the Fourth Amendment. And this idea of reasonable searches and seizures, what makes a

search or seizure reasonable? And, you know, it's one of those things that can often be difficult to define,

right? Because something many people think, and I've seen plenty of dictionaries to find a

reasonable search, is what a reasonable person would find reasonable, which I was taught in

English class. You don't define a word by using the word. So there's that whole question.

But most people recognize, right, if the police have a warrant, they can search. But does that warrant have

limitations when it comes to the search? Not just in where they can search and what they can

search, but how that search warrant is executed. Now, I want to get into this a bit more.

I'm going to start actually with a case that were oral arguments recently heard at the

Supreme Court.

In the case is Chattery v. the United States.

And it gets into the question of these what are called geofence warrants.

Now, most of you are walking around with a tracking device on.

It's your cell phone.

It's a tracking device.

...