Hello, I am Matt Williamson. How's it going? We are wrapping up the week here, a hot week.

With your mailbags. I told you yesterday, I wanted to mailbag it up yesterday, but I was a little late sending out the bat signal.

But got lots of good questions in the meantime.

Let's just dig right in here.

You know it's true, though, asked, did they not learn from only having one special receiver last year

to how teams can scheme against, not to mention if wide receiver one goes down?

I think they did learn.

I mean, I don't think, I think trading pickens has been in the cards every step of the way, that he had to go, kind of like Deontay Johnson, that they didn't want him around anymore.

I don't think they look at Metcalf as a one-for-one replacement. Well, I think they do. They're different, even though they're both big and they're

both downfield guys. But I really think we have to be patient about this. And I know we all got

teased about the Ayuk saga last year and all this

stuff. But I really think another receiver of consequence will be added. Now, let's give a time to

react to who that is. I've said for a while, like, if it's Gabe Davis, Romeo Dubs, somebody like that,

eh, okay, if it's a Mari Cooper, I'm a little more intrigued. If they trade for a Christian

Kirk, I'm a lot more intrigued.

Dubs, I guess, would be a little bit better than Davis.

So I absolutely think they've learned from that or even didn't want to get themselves in that situation last year. I mean, it wasn't real, you don't have to be a football expert to realize

that when Pickens went down, they don't have to be a football expert to realize that when

Pickens went down, they became really easy to play against, and that could happen easily.

So I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt. I very much believe another receiver will be added.

If not, then I think this is a really valid question. You know,

like, didn't you learn from how bad it could be relying on one guy? And I will say the Arthur

...