meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
What Next | Daily News and Analysis

SCOTUS Reviews Affirmative Action…Again

What Next | Daily News and Analysis

Slate Podcasts

News, Daily News, News Commentary

4.32.4K Ratings

🗓️ 1 November 2022

⏱️ 28 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two cases challenging race-conscious admissions programs. If the justices decide that affirmative action is unconstitutional—as they seem poised to do—how can universities still create diverse student bodies? 


Guest: Mark Joseph Stern, senior writer at Slate covering the Supreme Court.


If you enjoy this show, please consider signing up for Slate Plus. Slate Plus members get benefits like zero ads on any Slate podcast, bonus episodes of shows like Slow Burn and Amicus—and you’ll be supporting the work we do here on What Next. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to help support our work.


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Does your bank support your business,

0:01.7

or are also standing up for the things that matter most to you?

0:04.4

If the answer was no, maybe it's time to join an ethical bank.

0:07.7

At the cooperative bank we spent 30 years campaigning on issues like climate change

0:11.6

and social injustice.

0:13.0

And we also offer 30 months free everyday business banking

0:16.0

with our business diet plus current account.

0:18.2

Join us for business banking.

0:20.2

New customers maintaining a credit balance of £1,000 plus,

0:22.8

monthly limits for cash and check transactions.

0:24.7

Charges may apply for other services, visit website for details,

0:27.6

subject to stay as eligibility and season sees.

0:36.1

When the Supreme Court heard arguments about affirmative action this week,

0:39.8

Slates, marches of stern, was surprised.

0:42.9

Not by the cases at hand, he'd been watching and waiting for those to land at the court for years.

0:48.8

He wasn't surprised by the epically long oral arguments either.

0:52.3

Or by the many, many lawyers who threw themselves at the mercy of the justices,

0:57.2

one by one.

0:58.8

What surprised Mark was the nature of the arguments the justice is unspulled.

1:03.8

What was so remarkable is that the actual constitution, like the 14th Amendment's equal

1:09.0

protection clause, which is ostensibly at the heart of these cases,

1:13.5

it did not really come up until halfway through arguments.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Slate Podcasts, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Slate Podcasts and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.