It's Thursday, April 30th, 2026.

SCOTA says it's time for Southern governors to get moving oil prices to the moon yet again.

And it's time to listen to Erica Kirk.

Next on the AM update.

Huge case out of the Supreme Court yesterday in a six to three decision.

The Supreme Court issued a shocking ruling about congressional maps,

specifically one in Louisiana, that was drawn to give black voters a boost in representation.

The case, Louisiana v. KLA, involved a challenge by Louisiana voters in a congressional district

that was redrawn after the 2020 census. The Supreme Court struck the map down and

concluding it was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander that cannot be justified under Section 2

of the Voting Rights Act, Justice Samuel Alito, penned the majority opinion of the court and was joined

by his five fellow justices, conservative justices,

Elina Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, Kintaji Brown Jackson dissented,

and Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a concurring opinion in which he was joined by Neil Gorsuch.

The Supreme Court decided the time had come to deliver a clear answer on what for 30 years had simply been assumed about the Voting Rights Act case lie.

Essentially what this means, as I just said there in different terms,

you no longer have to draw maps based on representations.

And the way the Voting Rights Act is written is that you basically cannot have an outcome where there is a

protected minority that is quote unquote underrepresented. Now, underrepresented, that's my

terminology, but that's kind of the idea of the Voting Rights Act. So you can draw congressional

districts now the way that they kind of make sense or make sense for you

or the people of your state believe they want them to be. So that's kind of the outcome of what we

...