Scott Peterson Case BOMBSHELL: Destroyed Evidence & Recanted Science—Is the Conviction About to Collapse? | 2025 True Crime

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

True Crime Today

News, True Crime, News Commentary

3.3 • 907 Ratings

🗓️ 3 January 2026

⏱️ 71 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The Scott Peterson case has never been short on controversy, but the newest filings from the Los Angeles Innocence Project may be the most explosive revelations yet. In this Hidden Killers investigation, Tony Brueski breaks down two seismic developments that could shake the foundation of one of America’s most famous murder convictions.

First: the alleged destruction of key evidence. According to internal Modesto Police logs cited in the LA Innocence Project’s 600-page petition, detectives met behind closed doors on May 6, 2003, to discuss discovery decisions. By the next day, two major items were reportedly marked for destruction:
• The videotaped interrogations of Medina-burglary suspects Steven Todd and Glenn Pierce
• The safe stolen from the Medina home, just yards from the Peterson residence

Within weeks, the petition claims, both were gone — no copies, no transcripts, no forensic testing. California law is clear: under Trombetta and Youngblood, intentional destruction of potentially exculpatory evidence can constitute a constitutional violation. If these allegations are accurate, the petition argues, this wasn’t a mistake. It was a turning point.

Then comes the second bombshell: the recantation of the very expert whose testimony jurors described as “the nail in the coffin.” Dr. Terry D’Vor now states that updated NIH and WHO fetal-growth data contradict his 2004 conclusions, showing baby Connor’s measurements were consistent with a January death — when Scott Peterson was already under round-the-clock surveillance. If modern science shifts the timeline, the prosecution’s central theory may not survive.

This episode unpacks the evidence, the science, and the law — and asks whether the case against Scott Peterson is structurally sound… or structurally broken.

#ScottPeterson #LaciPeterson #LAInnocenceProject #HiddenKillers #WrongfulConviction #ForensicScience #EvidenceDestruction #TonyBrueski #TrueCrimeAnalysis #JusticeForLaci

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	This is Hidden Killers Year in Review.
0:02.7	A look back at the biggest stories of 2025.
0:06.1	This is Hidden Killers Live with Tony Burski, Stacey Cole, and Todd Michaels.
0:14.8	20 years after Scott Peterson was branded one of the most hated men in America, the cheating husband who dumped his pregnant wife in the San Francisco Bay.
0:24.3	The L.A. Innocence Project has thrown a legal grenade into that story. And we've talked about this last year when this started.
0:32.6	It continues on this year. They filed a 600-page post-conviction petition that doesn't just question
0:38.9	its guilt. It accuses police and prosecutors of destroying evidence, hiding witnesses, and
0:44.1	building a case on bad science. The petition claims the state's own expert has recanted.
0:51.4	Key evidence was torched after a secret meeting, and 15 witnesses who saw Lacey
0:57.0	alive were ignored. If even half of what in this filing actually holds up, California may have to
1:04.3	ask itself a very uncomfortable question. Did they go after the wrong guy?
1:15.4	Did they execute a character instead of proving a murderer?
1:19.2	Bob Mata, defense attorney, host of the podcast, Defense Diaries,
1:24.6	joins us to discuss these new filings with the LA Innocence Project.
1:30.7	All of the new data that has come to light the new accusations that are being made against the principle of the story itself. Bob, there is, there's a lot here. And I want to
1:40.4	work our way through it. But I want to get your take on this.
1:45.1	What was the, what drew you into this?
1:47.3	What made you go, oh, maybe there is something here initially as a defense attorney?
1:54.0	Probably the length of the petition.
1:56.3	Yeah.
1:56.7	When I saw that it was 600 pages, I knew that they had done some serious work.
2:03.1	So, and this thing dropped in August, and I hadn't really looked at it because it was massive.
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from True Crime Today, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of True Crime Today and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.