Happy Friday guys. And today we've got a short but very informative one for you. So Dr. Michael Ead's latest newsletter, The Arrow, I really recommend you subscribe. I'll put the link below. He's done a great edition today. And it covers in part the V topic, the dreaded V topic.

And he goes through the reasons why he himself changed his mind in late 2020 or early

21 about the likely efficacy of this novel, brand new technology at drug class.

And he brings up Scott Adams of Dilbert fame. Scott recently kind of went

out there publicly and pseudo-apologized for having gotten the V topic wrong, the MRI. But he

kind of threw shade on the people who got it right. So it's really interesting discussion. And Dr. Michael Eads will go through the reasons he formed quite strong opinions on this new

drug class.

And they were not, let's say, the narrative opinion at the very least.

So here we go.

Has Scott Adams been red-pilled?

So Mike goes through this in excellent form, as always.

So basically Mike goes through how Adams had got it wrong and admitted it by following all of the authoritative sources and he felt he'd done research and he came up with the wrong answer. And he apologised for that,

but not really apologised. He kind of said that the people who got it right were the ignorant

people, the people who simply didn't trust government, didn't trust pharmaceutical companies.

Well, to be smart in that sense. But he indicated it was because they were ignorant.

So he was kind of right to be wrong.

And then all the people who correctly read the MRNA situation were wrong to be right,

which is kind of twisted.

In Dr. Eid's summary here, Adams was trying to make the case.

He had done all the in-depth research and the

MRI vaccines to arrive at his, as it turned out incorrect position, while those of us on

the correct side had come to our conclusions based on heuristics. Our heuristics were that

...