The Bill I was checking out the website Peaceful Science and there are some scientists there who would rather discuss philosophy

when it comes to you and some of your philosophical views.

It seems that from time to time, reformed epistemology always tends to come back up.

And some of the things that you have said in your book,

Reasonable Faith, on our podcasts, on defenders on and so on.

And so they do bring up your reformed epistemology.

This molecular biology technician who says is an atheist says, expecting a man with the following viewpoint to come

to a rational conclusion when the tenets of his religion are contradicted by evidence is a

fool's errand. Then he quotes you from reasonable is a

Fools,

danger. Now there is a danger.

And all of this so far.

Some persons might say that we should never seek to defend the faith, just preach the gospel and let the Holy Spirit work.

But this attitude is unbalanced and unscriptural, as we shall see in a moment.

For now, let us just note in passing that as long as reason is a minister of

the Christian faith, Christians should employ it. And he put that in bold.

Right, that seems to be what he finds most objectionable.

Okay. An objection, you continue. Some people disagree with what I've said about the role

of argument and evidence. They would say that reason can be used in a magisterial

role at least by the unbeliever. They ask, how else could we determine which is true?

The Bible, the Quran, the Bhakavakita, unless we use

argument and evidence to judge them. Now I've already answered that question. The

...