Schrödinger's Innocence Right

Divided Argument

Will Baude & Dan Epps

Constitution, Constitutional Law, News, Law, Politics, Supreme Court, Government, Legal System, Supreme Court Of The United States, U.s. Supreme Court, Scotus, Supreme Court Justice

4.9 • 676 Ratings

🗓️ 2 July 2025

⏱️ 77 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

We talk a bit more about Trump v. CASA, revisit the usage of "general," answer some voicemails, and then turn to Gutierrez v. Saenz, a procedural tangle about whether a death row inmate can sue a state prosecutor over access to DNA testing.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Oh, yay, oh, yay, oh, yay, oh, yeah.
0:03.3	The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court.
0:08.0	Unless there is any more question to be able to find an argument in this case.
0:10.8	All persons having business before the Honorable, the Supreme Court of the United States are admonished to give their attention.
0:19.7	Welcome to Divided Argument, an unscheduled, unpredictable,
0:23.0	Supreme Court podcast. I'm Dan Epps.
0:25.3	And I'm Will Bowd.
0:26.8	So, Will, we're back to normal podcasting, just us after a couple episodes with other people.
0:36.1	So, you know, we probably will just do the kind of normal thing for a little while as we
0:40.8	try to pick up the pieces after, you know, I'd say a medium eventful term.
0:47.6	What do you think?
0:48.2	Is it kind of a mid term?
0:50.3	I would kind of the end of the term.
0:52.4	Yeah, mid is fine.
0:53.6	It's not, you know.
0:55.0	It's not a blockbuster.
0:57.0	The biggest end of term case in terms of newsworthiness is CASA, which, you know, kind of nerdy procedural case.
1:06.4	Yeah, no, it's one of the greatest predispendence of my lifetime, but it's not like normally the near times greatest because you just agree with it so hard.
1:13.6	And just so well done.
1:15.2	It's just to spare it doing it in the right way.
1:17.4	It's a vindication of the dispute resolution of model of federal courts over the law
1:21.0	declaration of model of federal courts, which is one of the great dichotomies in, you know,
	...

Transcript will be available on the free plan in 24 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.

Previous episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Will Baude & Dan Epps, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Will Baude & Dan Epps and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.