Well, it's been a long time since I weighed in on that controversy in Ferguson, Missouri,

regarding the shooting of Michael Brown.

You know, I spoke about it quite a bit on the radio show when the riots first occurred.

And of course, I looked at the evidence.

I actually weighed the evidence that we had at the time.

And I looked at the probabilities because you remember there was two versions of what happened.

There was the policeman, Darren Wilson's version, which we did get through a friend of his

was released.

And then we had what several supposed eyewitnesses claim to have seen.

And of course, all of the civil rights leaders or all the black protesters around the country,

not just in Ferguson, simply believed what these eyewitnesses had said, completely disregarding

what the officer had claimed and just accepted the diversions of these black witnesses, regardless

of how improbable their version of events seemed to be.

Now at the time, I was presenting both sides and I was objectively looking at the evidence.

And it was my opinion that based on probability, right, based on what version seems to be common

sense, right, what made more sense.

I believed Darren Wilson's version.

And I did not believe the accounts of these supposed eyewitnesses, especially given how unlikely

it would be that what they were saying actually took place.

Although I did leave open the small possibility that the witnesses were right.

And Darren Wilson really was a cold blooded murderer, right?

I said it wasn't impossible.

...