The left is screaming about the Texas anti-abortion law because it recruits private entities to do what the state itself is constitutionally prohibited from doing.

Does that sound familiar? I'll explain.

Also, Bet Middler is calling on women to go on a sex strike for abortion rights, or long as she even on a sex strike.

The Biden administration, the state department is blocking Americans from getting out of Kabul. What could their motive be?

And Amy Peekoff, the chief policy officer at Parler, joins me. This is the Dineshtra Susa podcast.

America needs this voice. The times are crazy and the time of confusion, division and lies. We need a brave voice of reason understanding and truth. This is the Dineshtra Susa podcast.

The Texas pro-life law is an effect and you know what? We're still here. The world hasn't ended. Life goes on as normal.

And the beauty of this is its demonstrating, I think, to the country at large and significantly to the Supreme Court, that it's okay to overturn Roe v Wade.

It's not going to produce the cataclysm that the left has constantly warned about. Yes, there will be red states that have some regulations on abortion. Blue states that by and large have more permissive laws.

People who really want could either move or simply travel from one state to the other.

So abortion will not be prohibited nationwide. It will merely be restricted in certain parts of the country that don't want it.

Now, very interestingly, the unique aspect of the Texas law, which is that the state itself doesn't enforce the law. The state itself doesn't shut down clinics.

The state doesn't prosecute doctors or women or anyone else for that matter. But private citizens are given standing or given sort of legitimacy under the law to be able to sue people who are helping to procure abortions.

Not the woman herself, but the doctor, the nurses, the clinic, even the people who assist in any way in getting her to the clinic, advising her to have an abortion, and so on.

And so this is, produce the desired effect. It's actually caused the major clinics to stop performing abortions after six weeks. They're terrified of these lawsuits.

And of course, there are righty lifers who are just waiting to file those suits. And the left is screaming. It's going to all over social media. It's all over the press.

And the idea is, this is outrageous. The state of Texas has deputized private actors to do what the state itself is constitutionally prohibited from doing.

Let's look at some of these reactions. Here's an article in CNN. It talks about the fact that this is unprecedented. This is a playbook for the red states. This is a devious scheme to create sort of vigilante system in which essentially private, quote, vigilantes are enforcing this law that the state of Texas can't.

And that's been Biden's position. Here's Biden. He says that the Texas law, quote, creates a vigilante system. The Texas Tribune interviewed John Michaels, a professor at UCLA law. He goes, it's a way of backdoring and winking while constitutional violations are occurring. It's compromising democracy.

Now, what I find all so interesting about all this is that while the left is screaming that the state of Texas is deputizing private actors to do what the state, at least as of now, can't do.

Isn't this exactly what the left approves of in the case of digital censorship? Let's think about what's going on in those cases. The Biden administration and the government, the Democrats in Congress, in the House and the Senate, are pressuring private entities, which is to say Twitter, Facebook, Google, to use their power and shut people up and shut people down and censor them.

In a way that the Congress itself can't do. Why? Because the First Amendment says Congress shall make no law, restricting freedom of speech or of the press. So Congress, and by extension, the government cannot directly regulate speech. So what does it do?

...