So therein lies the game of the prosecution versus the defense. And I know you must be salivating

to talk about this. No, it's a game, like it's a chess match and it's a chess match for

the biggest prize there is, somebody's life, somebody's future, decades, perhaps in prison.

And the reason why they're having this chess

match in court in front of a jury and a judge is because someone's life has been taken, or in a

case of a robbery or an arson or a rape or a kidnapping. You know, you're playing for all the

marvels. And this is serious, serious stuff. And the defense attorney, he's a seasoned

pro. I thought he did a good job. He was handed this case only a couple of months ago,

and he had to run with it and do the best he could. I thought he did an excellent job. She was

well represented. I thought the prosecutor did an excellent job too. At the end, when he was talking about the,

he was referring to the suitcases of box. I thought he did a good job because he see pointing to that

on the floor. I know everybody in that jury looked at that and said, a guy died inside that little

suitcase. And that really was probably floored them.

And so therefore, he appealed to them the way a prosecutor could. She got an excellent trial.

She got an excellent defense attorney, excellent prosecutor, excellent judge. And yeah, our system

may be slow. But let's remember, she made it slow.

And, you know, we had COVID, of course, in there too, but she made it slow with all of her

machinations. This could, this trial could have taken place two years ago, but she made it slow.

And this is part of maybe why people can criticize our criminal justice system because maybe it is slow,

but it's slow and steady. And we want it to be done all the trials. We want to take place

in a setting of calm and in retrospect so people could present their case the best they can.

Remember, she goes into that trial with the

...