4.8 • 2.6K Ratings
🗓️ 6 September 2025
⏱️ 8 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | It's a history making decision in this country. |
| 0:02.2 | A Supreme Court ruling announced minutes ago. |
| 0:04.7 | Legalizing same-sex marriage across the land. |
| 0:07.5 | 10 years later. |
| 0:09.5 | 10 years after the Supreme Court ruled in favor of same-sex marriage across the United States, |
| 0:14.5 | it could now be overturned. |
| 0:16.0 | What actually happened? |
| 0:17.0 | What did the Supreme Court do? |
| 0:18.5 | Well, we can start with what they didn't do. |
| 0:20.0 | They did not give homosexuals a right to get married. That is not what happened. What did the Supreme Court do? Well, we can start with what they didn't do. They did not give homosexuals a right to get married. That is not what happened. Same sex marriage is what happened and there's a difference and it's really important that we understand this difference. Okay, gay people have always been allowed to get married, but people of the same gender have never been allowed to get married. issue is not gay marriage. That's why I try to be |
| 0:37.5 | careful to not say gay marriage, or say the little as I can, and say same-sex marriage, because that's the actual issue. For instance, if a gay man and a gay woman said, I want to get married, for whatever reason, they're allowed to get married. If a straight man and a gay woman want to get married, they can get married. The state has no interest in their sexual orientation opinions. It's just that they're opposite sex. That's what marriage is. Similarly, with this new |
| 0:59.2 | lobbying past and new views, this means that two straight men could also get married. It's not about |
| 1:05.0 | gay and straight. It's about gender. What the Supreme Court did was they redefined marriage. |
| 1:10.1 | And they know this. That's why they said we're |
| 1:11.9 | redefining marriage. They redefined marriage to include same-sex relationships. Marriage, however, |
| 1:17.0 | is not a legal convention. It was discovered, not defined in the first place. It's according to our |
| 1:22.5 | physical design and nature. And even if you're not, if you don't believe in God, then it's based on our evolution, if you will. |
| 1:29.1 | So redefining it, when it's not, it's not, see, it's not a civil institution. It's merely |
| 1:34.2 | acknowledged with a civil institution, but it's not in and of itself, merely an institution |
| 1:38.8 | invented by men. Well, Justice Kennedy, who wrote the majority opinion, these five lawyers, there were five on one side, four on the other, four who disagreed, dissented, and they wrote the minority, you know, opinion. |
| 1:49.5 | Then we have the majority opinion written by Justice Kennedy. |
| 1:51.8 | He gave four justifications in the majority opinion, four reasons why they're going to redefine marriage to include same-sex marriage. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Mike Winger, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Mike Winger and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.