It's worth knowing which is really going on.

This is the Atlanta Journal Constitution.

Previously on Breakdown.

We were dealing with matters that had no precedent.

In history, we had no long books to go to.

We couldn't find anything that gave us any guiding light

or the service of beacon to where we know what to do.

And neither could have go to the history books.

It was not only that I didn't have anything from a legal standpoint.

I had nothing historically to go to.

And some people feel that might have cost Ford the election in 1976.

So, Brave was the anger over sort of sparing bits in a possible trial and conviction.

And to this day, I think people, historians, Americans are divided over that question.

But certainly, that's the one time when it seemed possible that a foreign president, a recent president,

would see justice for crimes in the committed office.

And his lawyers actually had the nerve to argue that that's correct.

That he would not, could not be arrested, could not be stopped.

And that he could engage in a murderous rampage.

And that no one would have the right to stop him.

And in the philosophy biz, we call that a reductio-ad absurdum of their position.

The position is so absurd that anyone can see that a sitting president

should not be so above the law that he has the right to start shooting people up Fifth Avenue.

...