My reaction to the verdict, his verdict, is one of, I guess, disbelief, still bothers me.

Because I feel he's an innocent man in prison. As far as I'm concerned, there's still

somebody out there that killed two people and are getting away with it.

In 1990, two men were murdered in the woods of Western Michigan.

There were no eyewitnesses and little physical evidence.

There were plenty of leads, but all of them seemed to lead to dead ends.

My only theory is two guys were killed out while they were deer hunting,

shot through the back, with no real motive or explanation

that I'm aware of.

The case went cold.

Then, 10 years later in 2000, a new team of detectives began looking into the murders.

I'm talking about this case.

We didn't get it wrong.

We did not get it wrong. It's there. I actually was willing to say,

Jeff might have done this because the police were saying, you know, we have this kind of evidence,

we have this stuff that is suggestive. And being what I am, had he committed the murder, fine, he should go to prison, right?

I didn't think I'd ever be found guilty, because I didn't do nothing.

But I know justice is wrong, and then once you get convicted, they do not want to release you because it's a bad mark on them.

This Monday, October 26th, undisclosed returns with season five, the State versus Jeff Titus,

to tell the story of a near perfect crime, the man who was convicted of it, and how two sets

of investigators came to two very different conclusions.

See, you've got to understand.

...