What say you Richard Hillen-Redock, are you guilty or not guilty in the felonies where you stand

and die-not guilty?

How shall you be tried?

By God, in my country. The exact time when Paul and

Magi Murdoch were murdered.

The end of the investigation, it was obvious.

I'm not here to work with him.

Okay. And the whole point is to have this not fall in the long hands.

This case is unique, it's unprecedentedolve South Carolina, the Murdoch's Murders Money and Mystery I'm Ann Emerson and I'm joined by our exclusive legal analyst and former South Carolina attorney general Charlie Kondin and our executive producer Drew Tripp.

All three of us had an opportunity to watch this stage get set for the

evidentiary hearing, what we've also been calling the retrial hearing for the double murder case of Alec Mordec.

And as we go towards this evidentiary hearing, it certainly feels like the retired Supreme Court justice from South Carolina, Jean Toll, had some very decisive moments in this what was a conference status hearing

to tell us exactly what needed to happen.

So I'm just going to throw it right there and say,

what happened? What do we think this is going to mean for the

retrial hearing. I think stages said is a good analogy and I thought the

stage that she set was all right defense you said over there you're not going to be able to do much. In prosecution you set over there and you're not

going to be able to do much which will benefit you greatly and let me handle things

meaning we're going to bring these yours in one by one. I'm going to ask the questions, not you.

And the standard is going to be, for lack of a better description, under the green case. Don't go to this Cameron case. We're going to follow green and you've got to show number one that there was jury tempering and secondly did any

tampering affect the actual jury verdict from the mouth of the jurors. They have to

tell me that for it to make a difference. That's what I heard.

...