S3 Ep263: John O'Keefe: Dog Bites, Theories, and Closing Arguments (Part 6)

Crime Weekly

Audioboom Studios

True Crime, Society & Culture, News

4.8 • 9.5K Ratings

🗓️ 3 January 2025

⏱️ 121 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In the early morning hours of Saturday, January 29th, 2022, Boston Police officer John O’Keefe was found dead in a snowbank outside a home in Canton, Massachusetts. According to the medical examiner, O’Keefe had died from blunt force trauma and hypothermia. At first it seemed like a tragic accident, maybe a slip on the ice, a fall that ended in death. But as investigators dug deeper, things became far more complicated and Karen Read, O’Keefe’s girlfriend, became the center of the investigation. Evidence that there had been trouble in paradise in the romantic relationship began to surface, but so did other disturbing possibilities. What seemed like a domestic tragedy was quickly clouded by allegations of police corruption and cover-up, and an investigation that many believe was compromised from the start. What if the very people tasked with upholding the law were covering up the truth? Was John O’Keefe’s death a result of an angry lovers rage- or the collateral damage of a police force protecting its own? In this case, the line between justice and corruption becomes confusingly blurred. Evidence disappears, witnesses are silenced, and as the truth slowly rises to the surface, it may reveal a web of lies that’s more dangerous than anyone could have predicted. Was Karen Read the scapegoat in a larger cover-up? And what role did corruption within the police department play in distorting facts. This may not be just a story of love gone wrong, it may in fact turn out to be a story of power, deceit, and the price people will pay to keep the darkest of dark secrets buried. Join us as we delve deep into the case of John O’Keefe and Karen Read, and help us see if we can get closer to the truth.

Try our coffee!! - www.CriminalCoffeeCo.com

Become a Patreon member -- > https://www.patreon.com/CrimeWeekly

Shop for your Crime Weekly gear here --> https://crimeweeklypodcast.com/shop

Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/c/CrimeWeeklyPodcast
Website: CrimeWeeklyPodcast.com
Instagram: @CrimeWeeklyPod
Twitter: @CrimeWeeklyPod
Facebook: @CrimeWeeklyPod

ADS:

1. ProlonLife.com/CrimeWeekly - Get 15% off your 5-Day Nutrition Program!

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Hello, everybody. Welcome back to Crime Weekly. I'm Stephanie Harlow.
0:15.8	And I'm Derek Lavasser.
0:17.0	All right, we're diving into part six of the John O'Keefe and Karen Reed case.
0:21.9	This is the final part.
0:23.9	I know that everything probably wasn't in here, but at this point, this case has just become
0:28.5	quite convoluted.
0:31.0	And I don't think, I don't think it's one of those cases, here, here's what I'm going to say.
0:34.6	I don't think it's one of those cases where the deeper you look and the more you know, the easier it is to figure out what happened. It's like the deeper you look
0:41.9	and the more you know, the more difficult it becomes to figure out what happened. Like it gets
0:46.5	you further away from where you want to be because you just don't know anymore. What is white noise,
0:51.9	what's a distraction, what's a fact? It's very difficult.
0:55.4	Well, I think you have covered most of the big, from what I've been seen in the comments and what I see on
0:59.3	social media, the facts of the case, you've hit them all. Yes. It's the interpretations and the
1:04.8	arguments behind those facts. And like the weird theories. Not weird. I don't mean weird. Some of them
1:09.4	are quite good. Yes. But like the theories that people know because they've devoted so much time to this and they know everything and they've made like flow charts.
1:18.2	And I'm impressed.
1:21.6	So that's that is one part of it where people are interpreting data that we've brought up or information that we've brought up and they're coming to their own conclusions. But you're not going to cover every single
1:31.1	argument here. I mean, it's to be a 20-part series. Exactly. And nobody wants that least of all
1:36.9	Derek. No. And here's what I'll say. Regardless of how much we cover it and regardless of what
1:43.9	rebuttal we may have for some of them,
1:46.3	they'll always be a rebuttal to that rebuttal.
1:48.7	So people, there's one thing I know about this case.
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Audioboom Studios, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Audioboom Studios and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.