meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Erick Erickson Show

S12 EP97: Hour 1 - The No Labels Shtick

The Erick Erickson Show

Erick Erickson

News, News Commentary

4.5874 Ratings

🗓️ 14 June 2023

⏱️ 38 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The grift of No Labels is finding itself being undermined by democrats plus the Biden family business corruption leaves him ripe for blackmail.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to the Eric Erickson Show podcast, Hour One.

0:12.7

Greetings America, delighted to have you with me.

0:15.1

It is Eric Erickson here.

0:17.0

Cross the nation, the phone number 877-973-4745. Should you wish to be on the nation, the phone number 877-9-37-374-25.

0:23.6

Should you wish to be on the program, as always, text the word Eric, E-R-I-C-K.

0:30.0

If I can spell my own name.

0:32.3

It's been a day already.

0:33.8

E-R-I-C-K, text it to 33-777.

0:36.4

You get all the links for social media, the podcast,

0:39.3

the show, notes, the live stream, all of that. Now, we want to begin here today. We, I,

0:44.3

you all get to humor me with no labels. No labels is supposedly doing a a third party run for president.

0:57.1

Every number of years, a third party offering rises up.

1:06.0

And probably the most famous is H. Ross Perrault, the billionaire philanthropist he ran for

1:16.6

President of the United States. In 92 and 96, he got 18.9% of the vote in 1992.

1:30.3

Now, I need to pause here and say something that is all but certain to be true, and some of you

1:39.3

will still disagree with it because you've been told one thing for so long you've believed it,

1:45.1

even though it's not true. In 1992, George H.W. Bush lost. It was 43% Bill Clinton,

1:52.9

37.5% Bush, 18.9% age Ross Perot. And a number of Republicans of a certain age to this day insist that had

2:03.3

Ross Perot not entered the race, George H.W. Bush would have won. That's actually not true,

2:09.8

more likely than not. And the reason we know it's not true more likely than not is back in the

2:14.8

early 90s, polling was pretty precise because everybody

2:17.6

had a landline, nobody had cell phones, and you could call everyone, and they would answer

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Erick Erickson, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Erick Erickson and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.