Today's sponsor is audible.com.

Audible carries over 180,000 audio books and spoken word audio products.

Get your free audiobook at www.

www.audible.com backslash undisclosed.

Support for this show also comes from pickmonkey.com.

Since 1738, pickmonkey.com has been the preferred photo editor for everyone from

George Washington to your friend with that cool blog. So whether you're editing photos or creating

collages, you can make great stuff with Pick Monkey. And now you, yes you, can have a free trial of

PicMonkey's premium service. It's a heaping megastpoon of bonus features, and it costs money for everybody but you.

So just go to pickmonkey.com slash undisclosed.

Hi and welcome to the eighth episode of Undisclosed, the State v. Adnan-Said.

My name is Rabia Chaudhry. I'm an attorney and national security fellow, and I blog at split-the-moon.com. I'm joined with my colleagues Colin Miller, who is an associate dean and professor

at the University of South Carolina School of Law,

and is also the blog editor of the Evidence Prof blog. We're also joined with Susan Simpson, who's an associate with a Volkov Law Group in DC,

and she blogs at the View from LL2.

So last time we discussed the key piece of evidence that the state of Maryland used to corroborate Jay's story, and that

evidence, as we all know, was the cell phone records. From what we understand, Adnan's case was

actually the first of its kind in Maryland. Never before had cell site location data been used as

evidence in a trial in the entire state. Remember, this was 1999. That's back when pagers were the

norm and cell phones were still catching on. So the prosecution broke new ground by using cell

evidence for two specific reasons. First, they used a call log to show who was called and when,

which we're going to discuss another time, and more importantly, what towers were pinged to

...