All right, Alexander, let's break down what happened over the weekend with the strikes into Kiev and not only Kiev, the outskirts of Kiev and other parts of Ukraine.

Of course, the talk is of the Erejnich.

That was the big weapon that was used.

And everyone is reacting to the O Odegnik being used, including

leaders in the collective West in Europe. And this was a retaliation to the terrorist attack

against the dormitory. I call it a terrorist attack, even though Ukraine, the collective West media refused to acknowledge such a thing.

I have not seen any evidence to counter that.

And you also have journalists on the ground in Lugansk as well, though BBC, CNN and other journalists from the Collective West refused to go to the location of the dormitory strike.

And where are we with all of this?

What is the reaction?

What's going to be the effect of this?

Is it going to be seen as a one-off?

We're just going to go back to where we were with escalating drone attacks.

How do you see all of this playing out?

Right.

The first thing to say is that I completely agree with your assessment about Sturabelsk.

I have read all the various statements made by the Western officials, the ambassadors,

at the UN Security Council. And the fascinating thing about this is that they refuse to really address what actually happened in Starrelbells

at all. And as you rightly say, journalists were invited to go. Some journalists have gone.

There is no doubt whatsoever that what was attacked was a student dormitory.

Now, there's been, you could argue that this was a mistake that the Ukrainians might have thought that they were attacking something else.

But they're not convincingly explaining why, nor is, you know, the West on their behalf.

...