Rushing to Failure (Ep. 519)
Thinking LSAT
Nathan Fox and Ben Olson
4.6 • 886 Ratings
🗓️ 11 August 2025
⏱️ 82 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Ben and Nathan field a handful of questions with a common theme: they come from students who are moving too fast on the LSAT, attempting too many questions, and failing to understand what they’re reading. In other words, they’re rushing to failure.
The solution is simple: Attempt one question at a time. If you miss it, review until you understand why. Then, move on to the next one. Slow down, skip all the gimmicks, and the LSAT becomes easy.
Watch Episode 519 on YouTube
0:33 – Reading All Answer Choices
Sydney asks if she can skip answer choices once she finds her prediction. Skimming bad answer choices is fine, but you still need to glance at all of them. You also don’t have to read every word. As soon as an answer starts moving in the wrong direction, eliminate it confidently and move on.
8:35 – Master’s Degree to Make Up for a Low GPA?
Joe recognizes that his undergraduate GPA will hurt his admissions chances and is considering a master’s degree to improve his odds. Ben and Nathan note that his 4.0 GPA in his senior year already shows he can succeed in law school. Graduate grades won’t factor into his LSAC GPA. Joe should focus instead on removing bad grades from his transcript and getting the best LSAT possible.
13:37 – Mean LSAT Tweets
After a 144 diagnostic, Chris sends Nate an angry email. Ben and Nathan outline the Demon’s resources for improvement—if Chris wants to use them. They also note that academically strong students often approach the LSAT like school: skimming, rushing, and relying on outside knowledge—habits that hurt scores.
19:12 – Worst GPA You’ve Ever Seen
Rachel has a 1.73 GPA and just wants to get into law school. The guys commend her paralegal experience but explain that her only shot is with a strong LSAT. Given her situation, she should consider part-time or state-accredited programs to reduce cost and risk.
26:41 – Two-Word Accommodation Request
A Reddit student gets 50% extra time for “severe anxiety” with a simple two-word doctor’s note. Ben and Nathan highlight the ease of securing accommodations but remind listeners that they aren’t necessary to succeed.
34:30 – When to Take a Break
Blake feels burnt out after hours of daily studying with little progress. The guys point out that he’s prioritizing quantity over quality. They advise him to skip September, focus on learning, and wait to take the official test when he’s ready.
43:17 – ABA Journal
Ben and Nathan scoff at the latest ABA Journal, which addresses loneliness, gambling addiction, and the California bar exam mishap just on the cover. Inside? A first-page ad asking lawyers to donate more money to the ABA with a testimonial from a dental hygienist.
50:10 – What’s the Deal with Purdue Global Law School?
Peter wants to know if Purdue Global Law School, a California-accredited law school, is worth applying to.
1:09:40 - Personal Statement Gong Show
Sophia signs up as the next Gong Show contestant. In this segment, Ben and Nathan read your personal statement until they reach an unforgivable mistake, then they ring the gong. The number of lines to beat is 21—the record currently held by listener Danielle.
1:20:27 - Word of the Week - Ameliorate
The new tutoring program was designed to ameliorate students’ struggles with reading comprehension.
Get caught up with our Word of the Week library.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | You should shut down your bullshit fucking website because it fucking sucks. |
| 0:05.1 | Oh, okay. |
| 0:06.7 | If you actually used our website to get help, I am convinced it would help. |
| 0:18.1 | Hello and welcome to episode 519 of the Thinking Elseap podcast. |
| 0:25.1 | I'm Ben Olson. |
| 0:26.2 | With me is Nathan Fox. |
| 0:28.0 | We're the co-founders of Elsaid Demon.com and the Elsaid Demon Daily podcast. |
| 0:32.7 | We have an email here from Sydney. |
| 0:35.2 | The subject is reading all answer choices. Sydney says, hey, Ben and Nathan, |
| 0:41.2 | I've been studying with the demon for about two months and have jumped from a 154 diagnostic to |
| 0:45.8 | 169 on my latest practice test. My goal is to reach a 173. I know you recommend reading every |
| 0:53.9 | answer choice, no matter how confident I am in the one |
| 0:56.3 | I've chosen, but I often find myself skimming the answer choices for my prediction on certain |
| 1:01.7 | question types and moving on. I don't do this with support questions or principal questions. |
| 1:07.6 | Wait, there is no such thing as a principal question, Sidney. But anyway, in case there is an answer with a better fit. But for more definitive types, like must be true or sufficient assumption, I typically skip the remaining answers |
| 1:27.5 | if I find one that perfectly aligns with my prediction. |
| 1:30.7 | What are your thoughts on this? |
| 1:32.0 | Thank you both for creating such a great platform, Sydney. |
| 1:36.0 | Okay, so skimming is good, |
| 1:40.3 | especially if you've found an answer choice that you love. All we're doing is we're looking for |
| 1:47.3 | answer choices that, wait a sec, might make sense on the surface, which would then require you to |
| 1:54.6 | dig a little deeper to make sure that it's not actually better than the one that you love right now. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Nathan Fox and Ben Olson, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Nathan Fox and Ben Olson and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

