Democrat big donors have been grumbling about the uninspiring Democrat presidential field.

A top tier, Biden Sanders, Warren, Mayor Pete, they're all cringe-worthy.

A bunch of dry balls for a host of reasons.

Those on the bottom tier are even worse.

Now devol Patrick has thrown his hat in a ring and Michael Bloomberg is expected to do

so.

So these supposedly centrist moderates should be the answer, right?

Well, not so fast.

Washington Post-Cottalmanus David Biver says neither Patrick nor Bloomberg are the disruptors

that high roller Democrats are looking for.

He says they probably will not be able to build a winning campaign infrastructure because

they jumped in so late.

But the problem's not just lateness.

The truth is, these two guys are just as lame as the lame candidates already running.

So Mr. Biler lists some Democrats that could disrupt things.

Michelle Mabel Obama, who doesn't need infrastructure because she's Michelle O.

The one Hillary Clinton, warts and all would still be stronger than devol Patrick or Michael

Bloomberg to this guy.

She would at least shake things up and Biler lists another name that we all know.

Al Gore.

Yeah, the single issue climate change candidate, but even he would be better than the current

crop accord in your this guy.

...