meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Advisory Opinions

Revisiting 3-3-3

Advisory Opinions

The Dispatch

News, Government, Politics

4.7 • 4K Ratings

🗓️ 12 September 2024

⏱️ 59 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Adam Feldman of Empirical SCOTUSand Optimized Legal Consulting joins Sarah and David to discuss the concept of a 3-3-3 Supreme Court and the challenges of measuring ideology. The Agenda: —The role of Chief Justice John Roberts —Similarities and differences between political and judicial conservatism —The jurisprudence of Justice Amy Comey Barrett —The prevalence of unanimous decisions Show Notes: —Adam Liptak's writeup in the New York Times —Feldman’s 2023 stat review Advisory Opinions is a production of The Dispatch, a digital media company covering politics, policy, and culture from a non-partisan, conservative perspective. To access all of The Dispatch’s offerings—including Sarah’s Collision newsletter, weekly livestreams, and other members-only content—click here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

You ready?

0:02.0

I was born ready. Welcome to Advisory opinions. I'm Sarah Isger. That's David French and as promised David. We have a special

0:25.0

guest for this episode. Adam Feldman of Empirical Scotis from Optimized Legal Consulting is here to

0:31.6

join us

0:32.8

and break down some of the trends and statistics

0:36.2

and all of that.

0:36.9

Maybe throw some shade on the 333 court,

0:39.4

which I'm super pumped about.

0:41.9

And where we'll start Adam welcome to the pod.

0:46.2

Oh thanks so much for having me.

0:47.5

But you just published which justice writes the most important opinions which sounds like a really impossible task to put one's finger on.

0:56.4

But you did.

0:57.4

You have fingers all over it.

0:58.4

I appreciate it.

0:59.4

Yeah, so it is, in sense impossible to do because everybody's definition of importance is going to be a little bit different.

1:09.7

So I have to give the caveat that I'm trying to capture it with a bunch of different

1:15.1

variables and if I can and this is kind of a general thing that I'm looking for in

1:20.4

my studies if I can find a bunch of different measures converging at the same thing, that

1:26.7

tends to show that I'm looking in the right direction.

1:30.1

And so if I can come up with a bunch of different ways to think of importance and I did in this article and they all kind of showed the same thing which was that Chief Justice Roberts writes the most important opinions,

1:43.4

and that kind of passes the smell test,

1:45.9

is something that in observing some of the opinions

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Dispatch, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Dispatch and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.